The science behind Orbit-Ed
Structured, research-backed assessment. Not unpredictable black-box scoring.
Structured conversations.
Juno and Nova hold adaptive, natural voice conversations that follow carefully designed evaluation structures grounded in behavioral research and organizational psychology. Each competency is explored through guided pathways that capture the same behavioral indicators for every participant. The conversation feels personal. The evaluation stays consistent.
Validated psychometric games.
Our games are research-validated measures of how people think and behave. We hold a library of games and match them to the competencies each role needs.
Research-backed rubrics.
Responses are scored against competency rubrics developed through behavioral science methods and refined through enterprise use. We map behavioral signals to structured criteria instead of asking a language model for an opinion.
Several methods, cross-checked.
We combine AI voice interviews, psychometric games, situational judgment exercises, behavioral simulations and case studies. Evidence from one method is checked against the others, which gives a stronger result than any single interaction.
Every score explained.
Each score comes with the evidence behind it, so decision makers can see why, not only what.
A framework that keeps evolving.
Our competency framework is refined continuously through deployments across enterprises, governments, universities and global institutions.
Our principles
- Behavioral science
- Organizational psychology
- Explainable AI
- Fairness by design
- Enterprise validation
- Continuous evolution
Research and validation partners
University of East London, University of Miami