Skip to content
All articles

How AI is Revolutionizing Hiring: eliminating biases unchecked by traditional approaches

Literature shows that the hiring process has proved to be biased and unfair. Biases such as racism, ageism, and sexism tend to be inherent in all hiring processes.

Sakina Maryam7 min read

Biases in traditional hiring:

Literature shows that the hiring process has proved to be biased and unfair. Biases such as racism, ageism, and sexism tend to be inherent in all hiring processes. Biases tend to dictate judgments in hiring candidates. Unconscious biases delineate judgments to a great extent. Francesca Gino, professor at Harvard Business School, mentions unconscious biases as having a critical and problematic effect on our judgment. He further reiterates,

They cause us to make decisions in favor of one person or group to the detriment of others.

In the workplace, this

can stymie diversity, recruiting, promotion, and retention efforts.

Why is unconscious bias concerning:

Unconscious bias, while sounding problematic, is even more concerning as it leads to early employee turnover, which costs companies billions of dollars, including the cost of hiring and training. The cost of one replacement is equivalent to one-half to two times an employee's annual salary. The monetary loss is evident, but the loss goes deeper than it seems. Losing employees also translates to losing team players, eventually leading to reductions in revenue and sales.

Unconscious bias in hiring deprives the company of top talent and missed opportunities, which adversely impacts company culture and growth in the long run. Subjected to bias, companies may end up hiring unsuitable candidates, overlooking qualified or probably ideal candidates. Unconscious biases may even lead to targeting the wrong talent pools, subsequently impacting the quality of hires.

Hiring bias leads to a lack of diversity, preventing organizations from having a diverse pool of employees, leading to unfair practices, and subsequently deteriorating a company’s reputation as an employer.

Diverse workforces have become more important for companies than ever before, as companies that are meant for ‘For some’ are at risk of lagging behind competitors in terms of revenue and growth, while inclusive workplaces have been known to be more agile, productive, and profitable, benefiting from their employees’ diverse experiences .

Types of biases in hiring:

Unconscious bias adversely impacts the quality of hires and eventually the workplace environment and company growth. From sourcing to interviewing, several forms of unconscious biases influence recruiters' hiring decisions, some of which include:

Appearance Bias: Based on a candidate’s appearance, recruiters tend to overlook the skillsets candidates possess. Studies show that physical attributes lead to discrimination. Attributes such as height and attractiveness have been known to affect hiring and promotion.

Confirmation Bias: Is the human tendency to favor information already known and overlook the rest that does not align with pre-existing beliefs. In an interview, if the interviewer has any positive or negative outlook on the candidate, the interviewer tends to overlook information that does not align with existing beliefs. Confirmation bias leads to unfair hiring as it impairs decision-making, tending to favor candidates based on a few attributes.

Halo Effect: Creates a positive judgment about a person based on a particular characteristic that stands out, influencing the interviewer’s judgment about the candidate. One positive aspect will lead to the positive interpretation of the candidate as a whole.

Horn Effect: In contrast to the halo effect, the horn effect influences the entire perception of the candidate based on one negative trait or mistake. This one aspect that the interviewer perceives to be negative dominates all other positive characteristics of the candidate. The judgment resulting from such an effect may turn into a missed opportunity.

Gender Bias: When seen through the lens of gender, candidates' abilities are often judged based on their gender, conforming to the assumptions the interviewer might have based on gender stereotypes rather than on the skillsets and capabilities of the candidate.

Attribution Bias: happens when the interviewer assumes the candidate's behavior to be a certain way based on the interviewer’s interpretations rather than on objective evidence.

Similarity Bias: Similarity bias occurs when the interviewer favors candidates who look similar to themselves in terms of attributes, experiences, and background. Bias of this sort discriminates against candidates with unique, dissimilar yet relevant attributes and experiences. Through the intervention of such bias, homogeneous teams may form within the company.

Racial Bias: Prejudging candidates based on their race or ethnicity renders them victims of racial bias. Companies lose competitive and culturally compatible talent just because of racial bias. Candidates from certain racial backgrounds are discriminated against in hiring decisions.

Affinity Bias: When interviewing, affinity bias can play a significant role in determining the direction of the interview, going in favor of or against a candidate. Human brains experience 11 million bits of information in a moment but process 40 bits at a given time. Affinity bias catalyzes this process, Additionally, people tend to assess others on the basis of how much they are like them. Interviewers tend to do the same. Sharing hobbies and interests similar to the interviewer may help the candidate ace the interview irrespective of their grip on required skills for the role.

Hiring rooted in unconscious bias turns out to be detrimental for companies in the long run. Organizations with inclusive and diverse workforces tend to thrive better in the face of uncertainty, accounting for better problem-solving and strategic planning. Reducing or eradicating such biases is pivotal for organizations to stay ahead of competitors.

How to reduce such biases?

Addressing biases in the hiring process is essential for companies. 19 out of 20 recruiters believe unconscious bias affects the recruitment process, and more than one-third identify it as a ‘big problem.’

Amendments can be made in all stages of recruitment, from screening resumes to interviewing, which can be achieved by automating the processes through AI. Biases in interviews can best be eliminated by the inclusion of AI in interviewing. AI plays a key role in eliminating unconscious bias, which presents a better evaluation for the candidates. The objective AI powered evaluation enables the company to have a diverse pool of candidates.

Artificial intelligence in recruitment:

AI tools in hiring have been a huge help in reducing biases over the last few years. With the inclusion of AI in resume screening, a large segment possible job-fit candidates have made it to later stages of recruitment. Through AI screening, resumes can be forwarded on the basis of qualifications and experiences, which automatically eliminates bias on the basis of demographics.

Since AI is trained on a objective criteria, there is barely any room for subjective interpretation. Candidates who meet the set criteria in terms of skill, experience, and qualification make it to the next round.

AI-powered interviews make it easy and convenient for candidates to express themselves without fear of being judged on appearance, hobbies, or interests. With AI integration in the initial screening, racial or gender biases are already looked for.

AI-powered two-way interview:

AI-powered real-time two-way interviews provide an even better solution, enhancing the candidate experience with its AI-powered conversational feature, which gives a human appeal to the interview while excluding the biases that come along with human interviewers.

The AI voice interviewer or avatar is capable of listening to the candidates and questioning them based on their responses.

Future of AI in hiring:

AI not only helps in eliminating human biases in screening and interviewing but also automates tedious recruitment processes, which is not only cost-effective but also less time-consuming. AI integration results in better quality of hires and also significantly reduces costs spent per hire, by as much as 30%

As organizations continue to prioritize diversity, inclusivity, and efficiency in hiring, the role of AI becomes increasingly indispensable. By leveraging AI-driven tools, companies can create a recruitment process that not only minimizes biases but also fosters innovation and growth by bringing together diverse perspectives. The future of hiring lies in using technology not just as a tool, but as a strategic enabler to build workplaces that thrive on equality, creativity, and mutual respect.